هذه الوحدة التعليمية هي مورد مرجعي للمحاضرين
قراءات أساسية
يقدم هذا القسم قائمة (في الغالب) بمواد تعليمية يمكن للمحاضر أن يطلب من الطلاب قراءتها قبل أي فصل دراسي بناءً على هذه الوحدة التعليمية.
- Binnie, Justice Ian (2011). Judicial independence in Canada. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
- Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law (2015). The Appointment, Tenure and Removal ofJudges under Commonwealth Principles. A Compendium and Analysis of Best Practice. London: Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law.
- Blankenburg, Erhard (2004). Independence and accountability of the judiciary - Two sides of a coin: some observation on the rule of law in Central Europe. In A. Sajó, eds. Judicial integrity. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
- Council of Europe, European Commission for Democracy through law (2016). Rule of Law Checklist. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
- Council of Europe (2010). Recommendation CM/Rec(2010)12 of the Committee of Ministers to member States on judges: independence, efficiency and responsibilities. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
- Council of Europe (1950). European Convention on Human Rights. Rome: EU, Article 6.
- Dandurand, Yvon (2007). The role of prosecutors in promoting and strengthening the rule of law. Journal of Crime Law Social Change, vol. 47, 247-259.
- Dallara, Cristina, Piana, Daniela (2015). Networking the rule of law: How change agents reshape judicial governance in the EU. London: Ashgate.
- Dawson, Brettel, Schultz, Ulrike, and Shaw, Gisela (2015). Editorial: Gender and Judicial Education International Journal of the Legal Profession, vol. 21, No. 3, 255-257.
- Di Federico, Giuseppe (1998). Prosecutorial independence and the democratic requirement of accountability in Italy. British Journal of Criminology, vol. 38, No. 3, 371-387.
- Di Federico, Giuseppe (2008a). Political relevance, independence and accountability of the judiciary. In R. Coman and C. Dallara, eds. Handbook on Judicial Politics. Romania: Editura Institutal European lasi.
- Di Federico, Giuseppe (2008b). Independence and accountability of the public prosecutors. In R. Coman and C. Dallara, eds. Handbook on Judicial Politics. Romania: Editura Institutal European lasi.
- Di Federico, Giuseppe (2012). Judicial Accountability and Conduct: An Overview. In A. Seibert-Fohr, eds. Judicial Independence in Transition. Heidelberg: Springer.
- Du Plessis, Anton, Redpath, Jean, Schonteich, Martin (2008). Report on the South African National Prosecuting Authority. SA Crime Quarterly, No. 50.
- Friedman, Lawrence M (1985). Total Justice. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
- Friedman, Barry (2004). History, politics and judicial independence. In A. Sajó, eds. Judicial integrity. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
- Group of States against Corruption (GRECO) and Council of Europe (2012). Lessons learnt from the three Evaluation Rounds, 2000-2010. Strasbourg: GRECO and Council of Europe.
- Guarnieri, Carlo (2010). The politics of judicial reforms. In R. Coman and C. Dallara, eds. Handbook on Judicial Politics. Romania: Editura Institutal European lasi.
- Guarnieri, Carlo and Pederzoli, Patrizia (2002). The Power of Judges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Hack, Péter (2004). Judicial Integrity. In A. Sajó, eds. Judicial integrity. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
- Holden, Livia (2018). Women Judges in Pakistan. International Journal of the Legal Profession, vol. 26, No. 1, 89-104.
- Huhtanen, Heather and Halilovic (2014). Gender stereotypes and attitudes within the judiciary of Bosnia and Herzegovina: a case for increased awareness and education. International Journal of the Legal Profession, Vol. 21, No. 2, 319-331.
- International Association of Judges (n.d.). Website (Mission and Values)
- International Association of Prosecutors (n.d.). Website (Regional Conferences)
- International Commission of Jurists (2014) Women and the Judiciary: Geneva Forum Series 1. Geneva: International Commission of Jurists.
- Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) (2013). Guarantees for the independence of justice operators. Rio de Janeiro: OAS.
- Kohen, Beatriz (2014). “Gender training for the judiciary in Argentina” International Journal of the Legal Profession. Vol. 21, No. 3, 333-344.
- Minamino, Kayo (2017). Japanese judicial education: working toward gender equality in the judiciary, in Gender and Judicial Education: Raising Gender Awareness of Judges (eds. Ulrike Schultz, T. Brettel Dawson, Gisela Shaw). London: Routledge, 43-52.
- Open Society Institute (2008). Promoting prosecutorial accountability, independence and effectiveness. Budapest: Open Society Institute Press.
- Organisation of African Unity (1986). African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights. Nairobi: OAU, Article 7 and 26.
- Organization of American States (1969). American Convention on Human Rights. Costa Rica: OAS, Article 8.
-
Owor, Maureen and Musoke, Harriet D (2017). Neglect of gender questions at the vocational stage of judicial education in Uganda, International Journal of the Legal Profession, vol. 21, No. 3, 281-296.
- Parau, Cristina E (2011). The Drive for Judicial Supremacy. In A. Seibert-Fohr, eds. Judicial Independence in Transition. Heidelberg: Springer.
- Russell, Peter H and O’Brien David M (2001). Judicial Independence in the Age of Democracy. Virgina: University Press of Virginia.
- SAARC (2011). Charter of Democracy. Kathmandu: SAARC.
- Sajó, Andras (2004). Judicial integrity. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
- Shapiro, Martin (1981). Courts: A Political and Comparative Analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Shapiro, Martin (2013). Judicial independence: new challenges in established nations. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, vol. 20, No. 1, 253-277.
- Shetreet, Shimon and Turenne, Sophie (2013). Judges on trial: The independence and accountability of the English judiciary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Slaughter A M (2004). A New World Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Solomon, Peter H Jr (2001). Courts in Russia, Independence, power and accountability. In A. Sajó, eds. Judicial integrity. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
- Stone Sweet, Alec (2000). Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Supreme Court of the Philippines (2004). New Code of Judicial Code of Conduct for the Philippine Judiciary: A.M. No. 03-05-01-SC.
- Thomas, Lord Justice (2007). Councils for the judiciary - States without a High Council: Preliminary report. Strasbourg: Consultative Council of European Judges and Council of Europe.
- Thomas, Lord Justice (2008). Guide to judicial conduct. London: Judiciary of England and Wales.
- Transparency International (2017). Global Corruption Barometer. Berlin: Transparency International.
- Transparency International Romania (2015). Integrity, independence and the accountability of the judiciary. Bucharest: Transparency International.
- United Kingdom (2005). Constitutional Reform Act. London: UK Parliament.
- United Nations (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights, GA Resolution 217A. New York: UN, Article 10.
- United Nations (1976). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, GA Resolution 2200A (XXI). New York: UN, Article 14.
- United Nations (1985). Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary, GA Resolution 40/32 and 40/146. New York: UN.
- United Nations Development Program (2015). A transparent and accountable judiciary to deliver justice for all. New York: UNDP.
- United Nations Human Rights Council (2013). Independence and impartiality of the judiciary, jurors and assessors and the independence of lawyers, A/HRC/RES/23/6. New York: UN.
- United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) (2019). Global Judicial Integrity Network Podcast: Preventing Gender Bias in the Judiciary. Vienna: UNODC.
- United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) (2019). Global Judicial Integrity Network Podcast: Women’s Access to Justice. Vienna: UNODC.
- United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) (2018). Global Judicial Integrity Network Podcast: Judges’ Use of Social Media. Vienna: UNODC.
- United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) (2018). Global Judicial Integrity Network Podcast: Training Judges on Social Media Use.
- United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) (2018). Social media: a challenging new platform for judges around the world. Vienna: UNODC.
- United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) (2015). UNCAC: Implementation Guide and Evaluative Framework for Article 11. Vienna: UNODC.
- United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) (2014). Handbook on effective prosecution responses to violence against women and girls. New York: UN.
- Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) (2011). Resource Guide on Strengthening Judicial Integrity and Capacity. Vienna: UNODC.
- United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) (2007). Commentary on the Bangalore Principles of Judicial conduct. Vienna: UNODC.
- United Nations (2004). Convention Against Corruption, GA Resolution 58/4. New York: UN. United Nations Security Council (2004). The Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post Conflict Societies. New York: Report of the Secretary-General.
- United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) (2002). The Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct. Vienna: UNODC.
- Volkov, Vadim and Dzmitryieva, Aryna (2015). Recruitment patterns, gender, and professional subcultures of the judiciary in Russia. International Journal of the Legal Profession, vol. 22, No. 2, 166-192.
- Watanabe, Chihara (2017). Introducing gender training in judicial education in Japan to support the judiciary, in Gender and Judicial Education: Raising Gender Awareness of Judges (eds. Ulrike Schultz, T. Brettel Dawson, Gisela Shaw). London: Routledge, 53-64.
- World Bank (2011). World Development Report: Conflict, security and development. Washington D.C.: World Bank.
- World Bank (2012). The World Bank: New Directions in Justice Reform. Washington D.C.: World Bank.
- World Economic Forum (2013). The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014. Geneva: WEF.
